USPTO serial 75516973
ALLOGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLOGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM SQUIRE
WILLIAM SQUIRE CARELLA BYRNE BAIN GILFILLAN CECCHI6 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068-1739UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for medical therapy namely, for use in conjunction with transplantation of tissues and solid organs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |