USPTO serial 75517265
Serial No. 75517265
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATER, MATT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75517265?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIVIAN POLAK
MIKE ABERCROMBIE DEVELOPMENTORSTE 2002459 W 208TH STTORRANCE, CA 90501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Educational computer software for computer users featuring instruction in the fields of computer programming, software development, and the use and function of global computer information network technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |