USPTO serial 75517349
NOEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chesterfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank R. Agovino
FRANK R AGOVINO SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | DINNERWARE, NAMELY, PLATES, BOWLS, MUGS, CUPS AND SAUCERS; SERVINGWARE, NAMELY, SERVING PLATTERS, SERVING BOWLS, GRAVY BOATS, SUGAR BOWLS, CREAM/MILK PITCHERS, BEVERAGEWARE SERVER, AND CHIP 'N DIP SERVER; ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BUTTER DISHES, NAPKIN HOLDERS, CANDY DISHES, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, COOKIE JAR, SOAP DISPENSER, CANISTER SET, AND TRIVETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |