Drawing for THE RENAISSANCE GROUP

USPTO serial 75517423

THE RENAISSANCE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE RENAISSANCE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES F. LUCE JR

The Renaissance Group LLC3100 Meridian Park Dr.Suite N-100Greenwood, IN 46142

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation emphasizing traditional models of business management and business financeABANDONEDJul 8, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 6, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 6, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 16, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 2, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance