USPTO serial 75517662
FTG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FTG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, T2W 3X6, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL F MARTIN
NEIL F MARTIN HALLER & MCCLAIN, LLP1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Agricultural inoculants containing beneficial microbes for use on seeds, seedlings, crops, soils and growing media for plants and seeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |