Drawing for CREME DE LA MER

USPTO serial 75517799

CREME DE LA MER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREME DE LA MER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLEY A MORADIAN

GREGG A PARADISE KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY, FACE POWDERS, FOUNDATION MAKE-UP; FACIAL CONCEALERS, EYESHADOW, BLUSH, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, MASCARA, EYELINER, LIP PENCILS, EYE PENCILS; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, BODY LOTION, BODY CREAM, SKIN MOISTURIZING MIST ANTI-PERSPIRANTS AND DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER; PERFUME, COLOGNE AND AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance