CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PILPA

USPTO serial 75518050

PILPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk, cheese, yogurt, cream, including dairy cream, and dairy-based whipped cream toppingACTIVE—
030ice cream and pastries, including frozen pastries, sweet pastries and salty pastriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 26, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Aug 3, 2001PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 27, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 28, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 12, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance