USPTO serial 75518348
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $3,900
North York, Ontario M3C 1V7, CA
NORTH YORK, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
North York, Ontario M3C 1V7, CA
North York, Ontario M3C 1V7, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace Han Stanton
Grace Han Stanton Perkins Coie LLPPO Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic integrated circuits; populated electronic circuit boards, cards and modules; and power supply and power converter systems, assemblies, subassemblies and components; electronic data memory circuits and data memory modules; plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards and modules; integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distribution services, namely, inventory control of computer electronic systems, electronic circuits and electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | refurbishment and repair of computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards; Consulting services relating to the aforementioned refurbishment and repair services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | distribution services, namely, warehousing and shipment of computer electronic systems, electronic circuits and electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | custom manufacture of computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards; Assembly of products for others, namely, computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards; Prototype fabrication of new products for others, namely, computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards; Consulting services relating to the aforementioned custom manufacture, assembly, and prototype fabrication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | product development services, namely, product design of computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards for others; Engineering services, namely, test engineering and testing of new products for others in the nature of reliability testing, product assurance testing, failure analysis testing, and product qualification testing, all relating to computer hardware, electronic circuits, populated electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, electrical power supplies and power converters and circuits and electronic components related thereto, data memory circuits, data memory cards, data memory modules, plug-in external electronic circuit boards, cards, and modules, and PCMCIA cards; Consulting services relating to the aforementioned product development and engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |