USPTO serial 75518494
COOKING.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2657525Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2002
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOKING.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARINA DEL RAY, CA
DENVER, CO
GORDON BROTHERS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LLC
BOSTON, MA
Other trademarks owned by GORDON BROTHERS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LLC
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
NEW ORLEANS, LA
BIRMINGHAM, AL
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Long
2635 Walnut StreetDenver, CO 80205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food preparation goods, namely, bakeware, cookware, cutlery, baking and pastry tools, measuring tools, serving utensils, electric kitchen and household appliances, cooking thermometers, timers, containers for storage and serving of food, drinkware, dinnerware, stemware, linens, barbecue and grilling tools, decorations and tools for decorating food, condiments, spices, staple foods, coffee, tea, sauces, baking mixes, fruits, nuts, salad dressing, beans and legumes, rices and grains, cook books and software in the field of food preparation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 1998 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting courses [, seminars, workshops ] and consultations in the field of food preparation and recipes and preparation demonstrations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COOKING.COM
- Other trademarks owned by COOKING.COM LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GORDON BROTHERS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COOKING.COM
- Other trademarks owned by COOKING.COM
- Other trademarks owned by COOKING.COM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HOFFMAN MEDIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TARGET BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COOKING.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |