USPTO serial 75518498
NAUTILUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAUTILUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tipton, West Midlands, DY4 7JU, GB
Tipton, West Midlands, DY4 7JU, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK DVORAK & ORUM53 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60604-3606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal pipes; metal pipe connectors; metal tubes; metal tube connectors; metal tube fittings; and replacement parts for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | power tools, namely, crimping tools for connecting tubes and pipes, and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Water supply units for delivering water from an external source through pipe systems and the like to domestic and industrial environments; parts, fittings; and accessories for the aforesaid units and their appliances, namely, pipes, wastes, tanks, valves, taps, faucets; and replacement parts for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Conex-Sanbra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Conex-Sanbra Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named NAUTILUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |