USPTO serial 75518508
OXYGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OXYGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN PASQUALE
KAREN PASQUALE OXYGEN MEDIA, LLC75 9TH AVE FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10011-7006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services for others in the fields of entertainment and education, namely motion pictures, television movies and programs, laser discs, videotapes, and CD-ROMs | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYGEN MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYGEN MEDIA INTERACTIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYGEN MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 02, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OXYGEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |