USPTO serial 75518672
KWCROMBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KWCROMBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-5726 Unterkulm, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shifra N. Malina, Esq.
SHIFRA N MALINA ESQ SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER CONDUIT APPARATUS AND SANITARY INSTALLATIONS; VALVES AND MIXING VALVES, MANUALLY CONTROLLED FAUCETS FOR WATER SUPPLY AND WATER DRAINAGE; WASHSTAND-, BIDET- AND SINK FAUCETS, BATHTUB AND SHOWER FAUCETS; SHOWER HEADS AND SHOWER FITTINGS, SANITARY HOSES, SHOWER HOLDERS, SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE FAUCETS FOR SANITARY RESERVOIRS, WASHSTANDS, BIDETS, SINKS, BATHTUBS, AND SHOWER TUBS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |