Drawing for NETWORK WORLD BANDWIDTH

USPTO serial 75518686

NETWORK WORLD BANDWIDTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NETWORK WORLD BANDWIDTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRINT AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICESACTIVE—
016PRINT AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICESINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
035ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADES SHOWS, EXPOSITIONS, EXHIBITIONS, SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES RELATING TO THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICESINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
042ROVIDING A WEBSITE IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES; PROVIDING INTEGRATED MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY ADVERTISING SERVICES, AND CUSTOMER DATABASE MAILINGINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance