USPTO serial 75519110
AMBIANCE IMPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMBIANCE IMPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Munck
WILLIAM A. MUNCK & ROBERT D. McCUTCHEON DAVIS MUNCK, PC900 THREE GALLERIA TOWER13155 NOEL ROADDALLAS, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING FURNITURE; IMPORT AGENCY SERVICES FEATURING FURNITURE | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |