USPTO serial 75519114
TOASTER BAKESHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOASTER BAKESHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indian Wells, CA
Indian Wells, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SWEET BAKED GOODS, NAMELY MUFFINS, BISCUITS, COOKIES, SWEET ROLLS, BROWNIES, DANISH ROLLS AND QUICK BREADS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |