USPTO serial 75519314
TINYBGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2541823Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2002
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TINYBGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDRA J. HORNE
ALEXANDRA J HORNE SJKERVEN MORRILL MACPHERSON ET AL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTORS, SILICON WAFERS, COMPUTER CHIPS, MEMORY MODULES, PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) CHIP-SETS, COMPUTER MEMORY CARDS, APPLICATION SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (ASIC) APPARATUS, DISK DRIVERS, PERSONAL DATA ASSISTANT (PDA) NOTEBOOK PERSONAL COMPUTERS (PCS), CARD-SIZE PERSONAL COMPUTERS (PCS), CELLULAR TELEPHONES, DIGITAL CAMERAS AND CAMCORDERS, AND RADIOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1998 |
| 035 | PACKAGING OF ELECTRONIC MERCHANDISE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1998 |
| 040 | ASSEMBLING OF MEMORY MODULES FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1998 |
| 042 | PROCESSING OF MEMORY MODULE PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kingpaq Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KingpakTechnology Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TINYBGA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |