USPTO serial 75519495
ITOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACY L. TAYLOR
STACY L TAYLOR FOLEY & LARDNER402 W BROADWAY 22ND FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing custom services for web sites and design of websites for others | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |