USPTO serial 75519656
PERFECT BUILDING SYSTEM SUPER BLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2411736Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2000
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT BUILDING SYSTEM SUPER BLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monkton, MD
Monkton, MD
Monkton, MD
Monkton, MD
Monkton, MD
Monkton, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Insulated polystyrene blocks used for construction in the building industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, Louis L.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, Louis L.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, William R.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, William R.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, Louis L.
- Other trademarks owned by Yost, William R.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PERFECT BUILDING SYSTEM SUPER BLOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |