USPTO serial 75519835
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dulles, VA
NEUSTAD WIED, DE
SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
53577 Neustadt/Wied, DE
Other trademarks owned by SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
53577 Neustadt/Wied, DE
Other trademarks owned by SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
SER TECHNOLOGY DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
NEUSTAD WIED, DE
SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
53577 Neustadt/Wied, DE
Other trademarks owned by SER Systeme AG Produkte und Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung
SER TECHNOLOGY DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
NEUSTAD WIED, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Medzhibovsky
Leon Medzhibovsky DLA Piper US LLP500 Eighth Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and program libraries stored on data carriers for digitally storing, archiving, searching, and retrieving documents, namely, data, text, language, and images | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business management consultation in the field of document archiving | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation and computer software design for others; maintenance of computer software for others; renting and leasing computer software to others; engineering consulting and services in the field of document archiving; and expert services in the field of document archiving | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |