USPTO serial 75519852
PARCOSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARCOSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-8957 Spreitenbach, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL F GREENBLUM
NEIL F GREENBLUM GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1941 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic dispensers for dispensing parking tickets containing coded and clear text for parking installations; electronic automatic cashier units for reading coded parking tickets and for calculating and collecting parking fees; electronic units operated by a cashier for automatically reading, calculating and indicating parking fees from information contained on parking tickets; electronic automatically operating units for reading and control of coded parking tickets; electronic automatically operated units for selectively controlling barriers of traffic lanes; sensors for detecting vehicles, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |