Drawing for VITA VITA MFG

USPTO serial 75519910

VITA VITA MFG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITA VITA MFG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE A. MAXHAN

LAWRENCE A MAXHAM THE MAXHAM FIRM9330 SCRANTON RD STE 350SAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, SHIRTS, BELTS, SOCKS, OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, SHELLS, COATS, JACKETS, SKISUITS, SKIPANTS, PARKAS, SNOWBOARD BOOTS, FOOTWEAR, AND HEADWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2004EX5MSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Sep 13, 2004EX5DSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 12, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2001IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance