Drawing for SRC COMPUTERS

USPTO serial 75519930

SRC COMPUTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, CHRISTINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SRC COMPUTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy J. Pifher

WENDY J PIFHER HOLLAND & HART ILP90 S CASCADE AVE STE 1000COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF COMPUTERS FOR OTHERSACTIVEAug 28, 1996
042DESIGN OF COMPUTERS FOR OTHERSACTIVEAug 28, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 25, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 3, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 11, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance