USPTO serial 75519945
GRAPHIC THOUGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPIVAK, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAPHIC THOUGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Mulholland
SUSAN M MULHOLLAND LUCASH, GESMER & UPDEGROVE, LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109-4310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used as a graphical user interface for the purpose of programming a computer to perform tasks necessary to permit the graphical linking of and data flow between diverse applications for use in mathematical, engineering, scientific, and digital imaging applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |