USPTO serial 75520040
IN LINE TRANSACTION PROCESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPIVAK, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IN LINE TRANSACTION PROCESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M CARSON
JOHN M CARSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, INTERFACE BOARDS, OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAMS, PROGRAMS FOR USE IN CLIENT/SERVER AND INTERNET APPLICATIONS, AND WORK STATIONS COMPRISING AN INTERFACE TO THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS, DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA, AUDIO/VIDEO TELECONFERENCING, AND DATA AND VOICE TELECOMMUNICATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION, COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SERVICES, UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |