USPTO serial 75520175
SECRETS OF THE BATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDMAN, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECRETS OF THE BATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Vincenzo
DANIEL M VINCENZO SALLY BEAUTY COMPANY INC3001 COLORADO BLVDDENTON, TX 76210UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sally Beauty Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sally Beauty Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named SECRETS OF THE BATH
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |