USPTO serial 75520636
PLEASE DON'T SLAP US
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLEASE DON'T SLAP US?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J Groos
RICHARD J GROOS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed avocados; processed beans; refried beans; borracho beans; beef and chicken fajita meat; cheese; chile con queso; chili; potato chips; chop suey; chow mein; entrees and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; peeled garlic; guacamole; omelets; processed peppers; processed pimentos; sausage; snack dips; soups; and soup mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorship services in the field of food products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGHLAND HILLS VENTURES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGHLAND HILLS VENTURES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PLEASE DON'T SLAP US
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |