Drawing for WWW.GREATPLAINS.COM

USPTO serial 75520871

WWW.GREATPLAINS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WWW.GREATPLAINS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID C WEST

FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA DAVID C W1100 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 2ND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041on-line educational services, namely, providing seminars, workshops and personalized sessions in the field of computer softwareACTIVE—
042providing information online in the field of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 20, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 20, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance