Drawing for EXTENDIT

USPTO serial 75520938

EXTENDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKINSON, RODNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTENDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN B SALAI

STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wiring devices, namely, electrical wire encased in hard plastic molding, electrical connectors, electrical switches, and electrical outlets, all for use in installing or extending electrical service along the outside of a wallACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 27, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 23, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance