USPTO serial 75520945
WHOLE WOMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHOLE WOMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK M LINGUITI
FRANK M LINGUITI REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY2500 1 LIBERTY PL1650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NON-MEDICATED BEAUTY, FITNESS AND HEALTH RELATED PRODUCTS NAMELY, SKIN LOTIONS, PERFUMES AND COLOGNES, COSMETICS AND BEAUTY AIDS NAMELY, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, LIP PENCIL, LIP PRIMER, BLUSH, ROUGE, MOISTURIZER, CREAM, FOUNDATION, POWDER, MASCARA, EYE OIL, EYESHADOW, EYELINER, UNDER EYE CREAM, EYEBROW PENCIL, SKIN OIL, SUNSCREEN, COVER-UP, CONCEALER, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH TOP COAT, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, HAND CREAM, BODY CREAM, MAKEUP REMOVER FACIAL CLEANSER , SKIN PEAL, SHAMPOO, SOAP, BUBBLE BATH, ASTRINGENT, MASQUE, EXFOLIATE, LUBRICANT AND EMULSION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |