USPTO serial 75521029
KNOW HOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KNOW HOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE C DATZ
LAWRENCE C DATZ DATZ JACOBSON LEMBCKE & WRIGHT1 INDEPENDENT DR STE 2902JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-5023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring computer hardware, software and peripheral devices | ACTIVE | Nov 7, 1983 |
| 037 | Computer installation and repair; installation of computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Assembly of computer hardware and peripheral devices for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the use and operation of computer software applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software; integration of computer systems and networks; computer programming for others; creating and maintaining web sites for others; leasing and renting computer equipment to others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems via all normal and customary means of communication including, but not limited to, telephone, facsimile transmission, e-mail, and in-person contact with the customer | ACTIVE | Nov 7, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Know How
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KNOW HOW
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |