USPTO serial 75521158
PALM PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PALM PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN N GORDON
MARVIN N GORDON HOPGOOD CALIMAFDE DALIL & JUDLOWE60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote controls for home security systems to control the operation of lamps, appliances, television receivers, stereo receivers and other consumer electronic products | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |