USPTO serial 75521398
BROAD STREET ADVISORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROAD STREET ADVISORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI ATTORNEYTHE AMERICAN TRADEMARK COP O BOX 375CANTON, CT 06019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CORPORATE FINANCIAL CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, STRATEGIC PLANNING, CAPITAL MARKET ACCESS CONSULTING, AND ONLINE COMMERCE ASSURANCE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 8, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |