Drawing for GENGAR

USPTO serial 75521698

GENGAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENGAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae

JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON ET AL1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028articulated and non-articulated dolls, bendable toys, ball figures ; board games; carrying cases for toys; decorative wind socks; electronic game equipment with a clock or timepiece feature; game cards; action skill games; manipulative games; parlor games; role playing games; card games; hand-held pinball games; kites; hand-held units for playing electronic games; nonelectric hand-held skill games; plush dolls; puppets; skill and action games; stuffed, plush and cloth toys; toy action figures; toy balloons; toy banks; toy puzzles; toy vehicles; toy whistles; mechanical toys; inflatable toys; bath toys; toy balls; toy music boxes; toy building blocks; modeling compounds; toy construction sets; toy mobiles; water squirting toys; hand held computer toy featuring a virtual pet; and yo-yosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 22, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance