USPTO serial 75521845
FINE-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FINE-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-59302 Oelde, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
URSULA B DAY
Ursula B Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR USE IN SCREENING, STRAINING, FILTERING, AND SIFTING, AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY SCREENS, FLAT SCREENS, AND SCREEN BOTTOMS FOR USE IN BUILDING MATERIALS, NATURAL STONES, CHEMICAL, AND FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |