USPTO serial 75521977
E-Z DIPPIN'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2000
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E-Z DIPPIN'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
CHICAGO, IL
PHOENIX, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert J. Singer
HERBERT J SINGER SILVERMAN, CASS & SINGER, LTD105 W ADAMS ST 27TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SINGLE SERVE SNACK IN A TRAY CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POTATO CHIPS, AND ALSO CONTAINING FRENCH ONION DIP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 030 | SINGLE SERVE SNACK IN A TRAY CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF TORTILLA CHIPS AND/OR PRETZELS, AND ALSO CONTAINING SALSA OR CHEESE, AND/OR MUSTARD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jays Foods, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Jays Foods, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Jays Foods, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by JAYS FOODS ACQUISITION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOH IP COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named E-Z DIPPIN'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |