USPTO serial 75522084
LE'-FORTUNE HAIR CARE CHIHTSAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LE'-FORTUNE HAIR CARE CHIHTSAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S. El Monte, CA
SHAAN HONQ INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS CORP.
HSIN HSING DISTRICT KAOHSIUNG, TW
Other trademarks owned by SHAAN HONQ INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS CORP.
S. El Monte, CA
S. El Monte, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Ling
C STEPHANIE CHEN Law Offices of C. Stephanie Chen & Associates17870 CASTLETON ST STE 307CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, hair shampoo, hair gel, hair conditioner, hair spray, hair styling mousse and hair cleaning preparations, namely, hair color and dyes, permanent wave preparations, and hair color removers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESUCHEN LABORATORY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHAAN HONQ INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ESUCHEN LABORATORY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ESUCHEN LABORATORY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LE'-FORTUNE HAIR CARE CHIHTSAI
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |