Drawing for SIZZ'LBITES

USPTO serial 75522106

SIZZ'LBITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIZZ'LBITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY J KELLY

TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Pet foodACTIVEOct 4, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 22, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 8, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 12, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance