USPTO serial 75522593
LANCASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LANCASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sophie B. Anger
SOPHIE B ANGER TORYS LLP237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-3140UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils for personal use; cosmetics, namely, foaming facial cleanser, skin toner, eye makeup remover, moisturizing skin lotion, moisturizing skin cream, soothing moisture skin mask, clarifying skin mask, eye mask, eye cream, night cream, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, body lotion, antiaging cream, sun block cream, sunscreen cream, suntanning lotions; color cosmetics, namely, foundations, concealer, loose face and body powder, compact face powder, powder blush, cream blush, eyeshadow, cream eyeshadow, eyeliner, mascara, eyebrow powder, eyebrow gloss, lipstick, lip pencils, lip gloss, and non-medicated lip balm; fragrances, namely, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, and perfume; bath products, namely, bath and shower gel, fragrant bath soap, perfumed body cream, body exfoliating cream, bath beads, bath oil, body oil, body shampoo, and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |