USPTO serial 75522649
TIKITBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHIE, BRANDEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIKITBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL LIROCCHI
MICHAEL LIROCCHI LANAHAN & REILLY LLP3558 ROUND BARN BLVD STE 300SANTA ROSA, CA 95403-0992UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric and scientific apparatuses, namely, computer software, computer hardware and computer terminals for consumer use, all for commercial transaction and database processing; electronic access cards; and integrated chip cards | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1992 |
| 042 | custom design of computer software and computer hardware for commercial transaction and database processing | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pathways Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Pathways Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIKITBOX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |