USPTO serial 75523161
AMAZING GRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMAZING GRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clark Summit, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN SAUL, EWING, REMICK & SAUL LLP1500 MARKET ST FL 38PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Medallions inscribed or engraved with religious or spiritual themes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | paper goods, namely, greeting cards, prayer cards, leaflets relating to religious and spiritual themes, bookmarks, mounted and unmounted photographs, picture and laminated pictures and photographs containing text of a spiritual nature; and rosaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Votive candle holders, pillars for holder candles and glass jars for use in holding candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing religiously and spiritually themed goods to churches, church-related and affiliated organizations and groups including schools, lodges, hospitals and other non-profit institutions, including for resale or giveaway thereby | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |