CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FXVIEW

USPTO serial 75523307

FXVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FXVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Mennenga

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3151 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06828-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BASED COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING MACHINES IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION APPLICATIONSACTIVE—
042MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, INSTALLATION, CONSULTING, DEBUGGING, UPDATING, UPGRADING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BASED COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING MACHINES IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION APPLICATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance