USPTO serial 75523564
LABRADORABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LABRADORABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W COOK
P O BOX 1989SAUSALITO, CA 94966-1989UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, BABY MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, BABY RATTLES, BALLOONS, BALLS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BASEBALLS, BASKETBALLS, FOOTBALLS, GOLF BALLS, SOCCER BALLS, AND TENNIS BALLS; BATH TOYS, STUFFED TOY ANIMALS, STUFFED TOYS, BOARD GAMES, CASES FOR PLAY ACCESSORIES, CASES FOR TOYS AND ACCESSORIES, DOLLS, DOLL ACCESSORIES, DOG TOYS, PAPER FACE MASKS, COSTUME MASKS, CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS, PAPER DOLLS, PLUSH TOYS, SPORT BALLS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LABRADORABLES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |