USPTO serial 75523566
LABRADORABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LABRADORABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W COOK
3030 BRIDGEWAY STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965-2810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, BANDANAS, HEAD BANDS, SWEAT BANDS, BEACHWEAR, BIBS, BLOUSES, BOTTOMS, CAPS, COATS, HATS, JACKETS, INFANTWEAR, NECKTIES, PAJAMAS, PANTS, SHIRTS, SOCKS, SHORTS, SWIMWEAR, TOPS, AND UNDERWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Meshell
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinale, Salvatore
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LABRADORABLES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |