Drawing for SKEETER VAC

USPTO serial 75524117

SKEETER VAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKEETER VAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CURTIS V HARR

P O BOXFARGO, ND 58108-2842UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRICALLY POWERED INSECT CONTROL DEVICE, NAMELY, A FAN DRIVEN VACUUM CLEANER USING AIR TO TRAP AND KILL INSECTS AND TO CLEAN UP DEBRISACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 22, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 7, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance