Drawing for FIRST CHOICE PLUS

USPTO serial 75524244

FIRST CHOICE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST CHOICE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Greenfield

STEVEN R GREENFIELD JENKENS & GILCHRISTA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance underwriting and administration in the field of chronic health careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 7, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 31, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance