USPTO serial 75524272
MOVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A DeGrandi
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE DEGRANDI WEILACHER & YOUNG LLP1850 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Liquid crystal display monitor, set-top-box for use in converting signals between cable television and televisions,digital television power adapter, liquid crystal display personal computer, mini notebook computer, personal digital assistant, wireless local area network composed of server and transceiver units, radio frequency communication system composed of full-function wireless cellular phones with computerization function, telephone set for use with a global computer network, video telephone for use with a global computer network, notebook personal computer, personal computer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |