Drawing for COMPUTERS 4 FAMILIES

USPTO serial 75524724

COMPUTERS 4 FAMILIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTERS 4 FAMILIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A GROW

MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN AND KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND PREBUNDLED COMPUTER PACKAGES COMPRISING COMPONENTS, NAMELY, HARD DRIVES, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, MODEMS, PRINTERS, SCANNERS, MONITORS, SPEAKERS, JOYSTICKS, MICROPHONES AND SOFTWARE FOR HOME USE IN WORD PROCESSING, FOR DATA BASE MANAGEMENT, FOR PLAYING COMPUTER GAMES AND FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 5, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance