USPTO serial 75524730
INFOTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHEILA M KALTEUX
SHEILA M KALTEUX LEGAL DEPTDANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO11201 DANKA CIR NSAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33716Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | consumables, namely, photocopiers, facsimile machines, printers, controllers, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment and multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, controllers, modems and scanners, and parts, supplies, consumables and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale distributorship of, consultation relating to | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of automated office equipment, parts, accessories, supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |