USPTO serial 75524768
HOMERF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2001
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOMERF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORA J THIELBAR
LORA J THIELBAR HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS333 MARKET ST STE 2300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2173UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT ALLOW FOR WIRELESS DIGITAL RF COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL BETWEEN PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DEVICES ANYWHERE IN AND AROUND THE HOME, RESIDENTIAL AREAS, AND COMMERCIAL AREAS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |