USPTO serial 75524772
NETWORK QUERY LANGUAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2480986Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2001
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETWORK QUERY LANGUAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH COAST METRO, CA
SOUTH COAST METRO, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest G. Bootsma
ERNEST G. BOOTSMA ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA, SUITE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for data conversion and software for computer network communications, namely, searching and retrieving data from a variety of sources on a computer network, and user manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |